RESUMO
Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the largest global epidemic in recent time. Chinese medicine has been recognized by the World Health Organization as an effective treatment for COVID-19, but there is still a lack of high-quality randomized, double-blind trials using placebo as the control to support its application, which may hinder its further promotion locally and internationally. Objectives: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction with variation in relieving major symptoms of mild and moderate COVID-19 by telemedicine. Methods and design: This clinical study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that applies telemedicine to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction in the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19. Eligible subjects will be randomly divided into either treatment or placebo groups for up to 14 days after stratification according to age (A:18-49, B:50-65) and the number of vaccinations (a: ≥3 doses, b: ≤2 doses). The treatment group will receive Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction granules along with certain variation based on their symptoms, and the placebo group will receive the same amount of placebo granules. Subjects will be prescribed different additions based on their symptoms and pathogenesis at the inclusion. The oral temperature, oximeter, result of rapid antigen test and symptom score will be recorded by subjects until they have stopped the medication. Subjects are required to have follow-up assessment by video-conference on days 7, 14 and 35. The time for the body temperature returning to normal will be used as the primary outcome. Discussion: This trial will provide scientific evidence on the use of Yinqiao Powder-Maxing Ganshi Decoction for the treatment of COVID-19, and the results would help raise the awareness in Hong Kong and the international community on the use of Chinese herbal medicine for treating COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05787327.
RESUMO
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an upper airways chronic inflammatory disease mediated by IgE, which affects 10%-20% of the population. The mainstay for allergic rhinitis nowadays include steroids and antihistamines, but their effects are less than ideal. Many patients therefore seek Chinese medicine for treatment and Yupingfeng Powder is one of the most common formulae prescribed. In this study, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Yupingfeng Powder with variation for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Study design: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A 2-week screening period will be implemented, and then eligible subjects with allergic rhinitis will receive interventions of either "Yupingfeng Powder with variation" granules or placebo granules for 8 weeks, followed by post treatment visits at weeks 12 and 16. The change in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) will be used as the primary outcome. Discussion: This trail will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Yupingfeng Powder in treating allergic rhinitis. The study may provide the solid evidence of Yupingfeng Powder with variation can produce better clinical efficacy than the placebo granules. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04976023.
RESUMO
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the current global pandemic of which residual symptoms exhibited by post-acute, rehabilitating patients include fatigue, dyspnoea, and insomnia. Chinese medicine (CM) has been widely used in China to treat different stages of COVID-19. While there are a significant number of clinical studies suggesting its efficacy and safety in its use during acute stage, there are very few randomized controlled trials focusing on the rehabilitation stage. Liujunzhi Decoction and Shashen Maidong Decoction are frequently recommended by official clinical guidelines in China to treat COVID-19 patients in rehabilitation stage. This double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of the two formulae [named "COVID-19 Rehab Formula (CRF)"] in treating COVID-19 residual symptoms (long COVID). Methods: Eligible subjects will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group in 1:1 ratio. Treatment group will receive CRF along with certain pre-defined CM according to symptoms for 8 weeks, while control group will receive equivalent packs of placebo for 8 weeks. Data in terms of Fatigue Severity Score (FSS), self-reported COVID-19 long term symptom assessment, the modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnoea Scale, EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire, pulmonary function test and adverse events will be collected and analyzed by SPSS 24. Blood test on liver and renal functions will also be conducted as safety measures. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CRF in the treatment COVID-19 residual symptoms in a scientifically rigorous design. Clinical trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04924881].
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal functional disease. Adults with IBS may experience abdominal pain, change of bowel habits, and abnormal stool form without organic disease. IBS can seriously affect their work productivity and quality of life, especially diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). The Chinese medicine JCM-16021 has been shown to be potentially effective in improving the symptoms of IBS-D based on a small scale clinical trial. Hence, a large scale clinical study is designed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Chinese medicine JCM-16021 for IBS-D with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern of Liver Stagnation and Spleen Deficiency (LSSD). METHODS: This study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 392 eligible participants will be enrolled with 2-week run-in, 8-week treatment and 8-week follow-up. After run-in period, participants will be randomized to receive either the Chinese medicine JCM-16021 or placebo for 8 weeks, and will have post-treatment follow up for another 8 weeks. The primary outcome is the improvement rate on the global assessment of improvement (GAI) at week 10. The secondary outcomes consist of changes of IBS-D symptoms, TCM pattern improvement, IBS-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL), IBS-Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS), safety, etc. RESULTS: A standard protocol has been developed for the study. The protocol will provided a detailed procedure to conduct a clinical trial and verify if the Chinese medicine JCM-16021 would significantly improve the overall symptoms of IBS-D with LSSD pattern of TCM by relieving abdominal pain, reducing stool frequency, improving the stool consistency and improving quality of life. The consolidated evidence from the study can shed light on the treatment of IBS-D with Chinese medicine. CONCLUSION: The protocol will provide details for investigators about the study following SPIRIT Statement. High-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine JCM-16021 for IBS-D will be provided through strict compliance with the protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03457324. Registered 8 February 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03457324?term=NCT03457324&draw=2&rank=1.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing skin disease characterized by recurring episodes of itchiness with skin erythema and surface damages. Chinese medicine (CM) is widely used for the management of AD in China not only by its own, but also used in combination with conventional therapy (integrated Chinese-Western medicine, ICWM). Although many clinical trials on the effectiveness of ICWM on AD have been conducted, however, up to date, no sound evidence has been established on the clinical effectiveness and safety of ICWM for AD. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the currently available clinical evidence on the clinical effectiveness and safety of ICWM for AD. METHODS: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, which investigated ICWM interventions with at least one control group using the same conventional interventions, no treatment or placebo treatment, were included. Four English (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED) and three Chinese (CNKI, CBM, WanFang Med) databases were searched. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane's tool. Meta-analysis was performed to pool the data. RESULTS: From 1473 entries, 55 studies were included, involving 5953 participants aged between 35 days and 67 years old. Duration of treatment ranged from 1 to 24 weeks. Only 2 studies were judged to have low risk of bias, 3 studies had unclear risk of bias, and the other 50 studies were with high risk of bias. ICWM was found to be superior over WM alone in improving clinical severity of AD (measured by EASI, SCORAD), health-related quality of life (measured by CDLQI, DLQI), long term control of AD (recurrence rate), patients/investigator global score (clinical effectiveness rate), and serum IgE level. Adverse events associated with ICWM were found to be comparable with WM alone. CONCLUSION: ICWM seems to produce superior treatment response than WM alone in managing AD without increased risk of adverse events. However, the current available evidence remains too weak to make a conclusive decision.
